A friend of mine is a shipwright and carpenter, frequently involved with
old construction. While he'll allow that his predecessors in the trades did
a lot of fine things, he's also dismayed by the amount of shoddy work he finds.
"People talk about how the Old Ways were better, how we don't know how to
build right any more, how we don't have any skills," he says,"but when I've
torn apart some of these old boats and buildings, I sometimes find that they
were just slammed together, and the only reason that they lasted as long as
they did is that they had really big, amazingly clear, tight-grained wood,
and that they used a lot of nails."
I thought about this the other day when I was in the office of Washington
State's governor. The governor wasn't in; I was there to install the last
of many backup suspension cables for the large-to-massive chandeliers that
festoon the Capitol building. We got the job as part of the team that repaired
and upgraded the structure after an earthquake a few years ago. We used Vectran
rope, sized to the fixture at hand, to supplement the chain that was the primary
suspension method.
Now this building was put up in the 1920's, and has held together pretty
well for all the years since. It is from the Massive Pile of Stone school
of architecture, a classic megalith of a thing, with a multistory wing on
either side of a 200-something-foot dome. A stairway as wide as a river delta
leads up to giraffe-accessible bronze doors, and just about every interior
surface is plated with marble, artfully cut and fitted. It's an amazing place,
full of the kind of attention to detail that exemplifies old-style artisanship.
With a few exceptions.
No, no, I don't mean that anything was slammed together'. Far from it,
the level of care and skill that went into that place is stupefying. And not
just the things that are in public view. In the course of our work, we talked
to electricians, plumbers, masons, painters, etc., and they all marveled at
the wonderfully overbuilt and elegant stuff they came across in the course
of the upgrade. We did too, especially in the degree of detail in the carvings
and castings of those old light fixtures - things that you couldn't even see
from more than five feet away, on fixtures that hung more like fifty feet
from the nearest viewer. The exceptions to excellence tended, instead, to
be conceptual mistakes, or the results of working with limited technology.
So wiring, a marvel of modernity when it was installed, was, in contemporary
terms, enough to give an electrical inspector the dry heaves. And plastered
walls, great vast panels that bounded the legislative chambers, threatened
to cause a sharp decrease in the lawyer population, should another quake occur.
In these instances and others, technology had made real advances in the past
eighty years.
Our job involved all the chandeliers that hung in important offices, and
over pedestrian exit pathways, so that bureaucrats won't have to dodge plummeting
Art Deco masterpieces in the event of another quake. The chains that most
of the chandeliers hang from, including the ones in the Governor's office,
are of a peculiar design, with unwelded links, joined at the bottom or top.
So the weight on each link tends to force it open. Bad. At least two chandeliers
had fallen during or after the quake, and we found some that were close to
having a link fail. Before we came along, the only thing holding the chandelier
up, in the event of link failure, would have been the shiny new wiring that
had just been installed.
"What were they thinking?", we asked ourselves as we rove and secured our
Vectran lanyards. Did they really think that this was the right chain for
the job? Was the chain meant to be decorative, and a predecessor of our lanyards
meant to take the load? We didn't know. We only knew that, for all practical
purposes, our work was the primary suspension, and the wiring the secondary.
We worked out a method by which our lines took at least half the total loads,
so that in the event of chain failure the effects of shock loading would be
minimized. And we developed an evolution of the Stays'l Halyard Hitch to secure
the lower end, to compensate for the slickness of the rope. And we scaled
the Vectran to compensate for the severe weakening effects of knots on this
material.
So, to get back to the Governor's office, I found myself surrounded by some
of the best work in human history. Amazing masonry, beautiful design, lovely
fixtures, and all in an edifice, no matter how much compromised by greed and
shortsightedness, still dedicated to the surpassingly noble concept that humans
can conduct their lives in harmony - or at least in workable chaos. Nothing
around me was perfect, but all of it had in it evidence of an intent to approach
perfection.
As someone who works at times on traditional rigs, I, too, have come across
things that only held together because they were massive. I, too, have been
disappointed, grieved even, that riggers from the olden days were not the
high-minded artistes I might want them to be. Likewise I have often felt pity
for the sailors and riggers of old who didn't have Dacron, or epoxy, or computer
modeling, or all the other marvels that we can make use of today. But a little
reflection shows that my pity is misplaced; the point is not to have the best
for what you do, but to do the best with what you have. Not everybody aspires
to this nowadays, and not everybody did in times past, but enough of us did
- and do - that there is some beauty and graciousness and balance in our lives,
whereas by purely rational, skeptical standards there should be none. The
Old Ways, the ways we revere, are the ways of those who struggle against the
temptation to be merely adequate, who won't listen to the insistent, cynical
voice that keeps repeating, "What's the point?", and who leave behind structures
and ideas and arts that help the next generation see what the point might
be.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss