SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2015, 05:15 AM
Lee Catlow Lee Catlow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Default T-ball conversion

Greetings,

Planning to replace our rigging on our 1976 Tayana 37 for extended cruising in tropics; externalizing the chainplates, replacing swaged fittings with Sta-loks, etc.

I get heartburn every time I look up at that unfair lead where the T-ball fittings are swaged onto the wire, and want to convert to tang-and-eye (or fork) connection.

What details need consideration on this conversion? Best practices for attaching tang to mast? (it's an Isomat NG 80).

Thanks for any enlightenment...

LC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2015, 07:59 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Options

Hello,
I feel your pain, but it is usually not difficult to make the conversion. The simplest method is just to bypass the existing tangs, and making holes for conventional ones. The question is whether to do this above or below the old ones. How close to the spreaders are the old ones?
It is also possible to run the throughbolt through the old holes, though this leaves a worrying open oval above the new tangs. If you take this route, it would be worth considering reinforcing the mast there. The advantage of this method is that angles don't change, and no new holes are needed.
For those not aware of it. by the way, T-bar terminals have the highest failure rate of any termina.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2015, 11:43 AM
Lee Catlow Lee Catlow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks Brion,

"The question is whether to do this above or below the old ones. How close to the spreaders are the old ones?"

These are the intermediates, alongside the forestay, well above the spreaders (the lowers attach to tangs just below the spreaders).

So how about using the original oval hole for the T-ball, with a new thru-bolt and compression sleeve, and have the shear load carried on a good sized bearing plate riveted (?) to the exterior of the mast wall?

I forgot to mention in my original post that I'd also like to add running backstays; would it be appropriate to hang tangs for those on the new thru-bolt?

Thanks
LC
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-18-2015, 11:22 PM
Bob Oram Bob Oram is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Default t balls

This is a bit off topic but I'm new here and feeling my way.
Interested to hear that t balls have the highest failure rate.
We have some big cats using t balls for just about everything.
A crucial point is to align the wire with the fitting [err we simply bend them to align them]. To date we havn't had failures but check, check, check like everything else on the rig.
Does anybody know off a simple and elegant rotating hounds fitting/setup using as much synthetics as possible and the least amount of metal possible, or are still in experiment land!
Would like to have the shrouds forward of the section to ease over rotating.
Any photos or links would be lobely.
Thank you all
Bob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.