![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I recently called Colligo Marine, requesting advice on thier chainplate distributers. i wanted to ensure my new plates would fit them. they told me that they have found that on the bigger boats the deadeyes do not give enough pretension, and therefore they reccomend turnbuckles. this makes sense but i do like the new/old look and the simplicity that deadeyes provide. i was wondering if i could get enough pretension using turnbuckles for the cap and intermediate shrouds but use deadeyes for the fwd/aft lower shrouds, and Checkstay (cutter rig, but not sure if that is the right term).
Thanks Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If you know what the rig tension on the shrouds should be, just ask Colligio of that is attainable with the deadeyes. But my guess is that you probably can't. The load differences between uppers and lowers is not often that great, so I would be a little hesitant about it. That being said, if the guys at Colligio say you can, then I would have no problem trying. They really are the experts when it comes to Dynex rigging.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I am in the process of doing this as well. I am using turnbuckles. The biggest problem I am having is incompatibility of standard rigging hardware with the Colligo dead eyes. Colligo designed their dead eyes for use with lashings. Unfortunately, the clevis pin holes are all too small for the appropriate turnbuckles. John Franta said they are using A/R toggles and bending them a little to get the dead eye in. I did not like that idea for more than one reason. The width of each size of dead eye requires the next size up of turnbuckle to provide proper clearance in the toggle jaw for the width of the dead eye. But that next size up of toggle has a pin too large for the dead eye. So for my lowers: on the bottom end it looks like I am going to start with 1/2" Hayn turnbuckles to fit the chainplates, then take 5/8" Hayn t-bolt toggles, turn and thread the t-bolt to 1/2-20 for the turnbuckle and then make a stepped pin with a bushing on one end to adapt the 5/8 toggle to the Colligo dead eye. On the top end I am making some custom forks wide enough for the dead eyes. Then on to the uppers and intermediates. Hopefully they will require less custom work.
Last edited by rockfordwoods : 05-03-2012 at 01:56 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dear Rock,
Correctly selected turnbuckles are fine with the new Dyneema types recently developed by companies like Hampidjan, and more recently, Marlow in the UK. I attach pictures of the Dynex materials fittings we have made in preparation for the re-rig, in Dynex Dux with overbraid, of the 120 foot schooner SOUTHERN CLOUD here in Sydney. With care, a bit of application and the assistance of a gifted machinist, I arrived at a set of bobbin thimbles that are of a size that fit into the slightly modified mast tangs and turnbuckle jaws. Everything I have seen and tested and broken over the last 25 years that I have been supplying and using lines and tendons in Spectra/Dyneema leads me to the conclusion that, providing your sizing and end treatment execution are competent and considered, you do not need the huge bending radii that some components on the market exhibit. The dead-eye and lanyard type thimbles/connectors/what-have-you that are available from Colligo and Precourt, amongst others, are nicely machined and finished but seem to be more suited to do it yourself types of installations or multihull applications, and the like, where the boat often moves more than the rigging, rather than narrow-angled rigs on keelboats. ( Having said that, I used them succesfully in the (not particularly narrow angled ) rigging that Mike Strong supplied to Nacho Postigo's boat as featured on the Colligo website, but that was a while ago and I still think that boat would have been better served if I had insisted on turnbuckles and bobbins. ) For tension members supplied to the aforementioned keelboats and other projects on a commercial basis that I am willing to stand behind ( no pun inteded ) I use either widely available heavy stainless thimbles from Crosby et-al - which I modify - or my own manufacture of bobbin thimbles (in a variety of materials, depending on duty ) fitted into standard turnbuckles and tangs. At the other end of the spectrum, we are in the middle of supplying two sets of rigging for a new-build International 8 metre that is to be campaigned on the European circuit. This involved a fair bit of imaginative thought to incorporate the Dyneema into tip cup type spreader fittings and spreader root attachments for the discontinuous athwartships rigging. This type of rig would not have been possible if we were constrained to using the bend radii and general largeness of Colligo/Precourt type of fittings. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Regards, Joe Henderson, Henderson Rigging. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thank you for those pictures, very impressive. you reference bobbins however, ireally like the turnbuckles with the"bobbin"? at the top. while i suspect thier usefullness, i feel i am just shy of complete understanding. can you give a diagram of how one of those stays are put together? am i right in that these are "lashing bobbins"? and that they are used to connect to the tunbuckle to the end of the stay with a lashing but use the turnbuckle for tensioning? Do you have any pictures of one of these put together, or just the lashing portion? Please clarify.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() bobbin thimble, as in using the bobbin as a thimble, direct to the turnbuckle. i dont think i have ever seen an eye splice to a bobbin, do you have any pictures?
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|