![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My 1987 Cabo Rico 38 has an Isomat mast. As such, the masthead wire fittings are stemballs. Since a stemball headstay fitting necessitates using a stemball eye to toggles to permit enough headstay articulation for a furler, this results in the top of the foil being a little lower than a mast with a standard headstay with no stemball. What this boils down to is that I'm having trouble deciding on the best option for a roller furler unit. The local rigger likes (and likes to sell) Harken. From what I've read, unless I can maintain 7-10 degrees halyard to headstay angle, I'll likely have wrap issues (from Harken's manual). Schaefer allows parallel but would rather a small angle. Is a halyard restrainer my only option? My general feeling is that a restrainer is not optimal. Which leads to my final option. I could "deal with" and address the other issues of a Profurl in order to gain the benefits of their anti-wrap thing-a-ka-bob. Does it actually work? Or am I better off with a halyard restrainer on a Harken or Schaefer? On a related subject, if I were to go with Harken, on a heavy cruiser am I better off with a MK-IV or a Cruising unit? And now it looks like Harken is discontinuing the Cruising Unit and replacing it with the ESP, which just looks really cheap and of cheesy plastic.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My Beneteau First 38 also has an Isomat mast, and a previous owner went with a Schaefer furler, and they installed a restrainer in the form of a large bail bolted through the center of the mast that keeps all the halyards near the mast for about six inches below the blocks. My I/J is much more acute than yours, and without the bail, the lead to the furler is very negative, so removing it didn't seem to be an option.
I don't particularly like the look of the approach, but since I don't have a real spinnaker block on a crane, the restrainer also lets me fly a chute with a jib halyard (not wire) without worrying about chafe due to entering the masthead block at the wrong angle, since all three jib halyards are under the restrainer. It does induce a little friction in the hoisting and shortens the max luff of the genoa nearly a foot, but since I'm not racing, I can live without the minor sail area difference. When I bought the boat, the furler was very stiff, and Schaefer gave me a very nice price on a new lower bearing since they had re-designed it to eliminate an engineering problem. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Thanks for the feedback. Interesting approach. Nice boat. Isn't a First 38 what the Copelands sailed RTW? I had heard that Schaefer was taking care of folks with the older bearings. It's always nice to hear about a company who takes care of and respects their customers. -Tom
Last edited by Saltyhog : 12-11-2012 at 08:09 AM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BTW, perhaps I'm being too hasty in my judgement of the Harken ESP. I have not actually seen one in person. It just *seems* to be made to a price point not to a specific purpose. If the MK-IV and ESP are constructed to equal quality levels but directed to racing / cruising respectively, then great. If however the ESP is built to a price first and purpose second, I'm less interested. Nothing wrong with a good price, but robustness is my priority for my particular application.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I could "deal with" and address the other issues of a Profurl in order to gain the benefits of their anti-wrap thing-a-ka-bob. Does it actually work?"
I bought and installed a Profurl on my Bristol 34 in 2001. The wrapstop feature was a primary reason for selecting Profurl and I can report that it has worked flawlessly. I was a little concerned about the carbon steel bearings but have had no problems with them. Jim Fulton |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|