A concern about the Arborist Splice

[RonReese]

Originally Posted by NickfromWI

Ron, are you still talking about arborist rope?...

Well this thing has kinda "moved" from the orginal inquiry, but I've learned a lot and hope it hasn't been too much of a drift.

Nick, I think the answer to your question is yes, but there is arborist rope and then there is arborist rope. To wit: Arbormaster is a 16 strand with a unique splice for that type of rope construction. Velocity is a 24 strand double braid construction arborist rope but it uses a different splice than ArborMaster type ropes.

But, both of these ropes are advertised as simply spliceable. Other arborist ropes, such as ArborPlex, and some others, are listed as not spliceable at all. Yet other arborist ropes, such as New England's Fly, Samson's Yellow Jacket, Yale's XTC series, Wall Rope's Pro Stripe and Pro Spec are listed as, and I quote from SherrillTree's catalog, "Spliceable (eye, 1 end)"

So I was wondering why some ropes are spliceable, period, and some are listed as, "Spliceable (eye, 1 end)"?

Are the ends different somehow?

Does "Spliceable (eye, 1 end)" imply that if you cut off 4 -5 feet of the rope from the spliceable end, it now becomes unspliceable?

Originally Posted by NickfromWI

...if you were to descend 60' out of a tree on a 120' rope, when you got to the end, your friction hitch would have milked 120' worth of slack and sent it into the splice on the tail end. You know that splice is a delicately balanced act of tension, and now you messing with all that, risking loosening the splice, and you can figure out what happens next.

IF the splice is properly secured with stitching or whipping, the milking should stop at the stitching or whipping. I think that is the quintessence of the importance of a properly secured (stitched or whipped) splice. I.e. it protects the splice during no loads and adverse handling conditions such as milking.

However, in a double braid splice even if the splice had not been stitched, while it wouldn't be a desireable condition, I don't see that the milking issue would necessarily lead to a catastrophe since the final step of the splice is to bury the cross-over via milking. Certainly the eye would become smaller IF the milking was forceful enough to force the cover over more of the splice. But when force was applied to the eye, it seems like the rope would simply adjust to a smaller eye, or back to near it's original size. But that's just an opinion, that is not backed by experience.

But, it is somewhat of a moot point, since I think the one thing we all agreed on from the start, is that all splices should be secured by stitching or whipping.

And Nick, I saw where you posted this on another forum.

Originally Posted by NickfromWI

."Ron, we're on the same page. Stitching DOESN'T make the splice stronger. It makes it more secure. In some of the break tests I've seen, the whipping is the first to go, when the rope is really pushed to the max, because sometimes the splice "adjusts" so that the cover/core are holding the load equally.

Will some one get me a rope-breaking machine for christmas?"

I thought that was very enlightening and took the liberty of quoting you here. If you have any objection to that, I will remove it immediately. But I thought it was very mcuh worth sharing.

And I'd like to have rope testing machine too. But maybe I do. We actually have a 20,000 pound tensile machine here at school. We're waiting on a repair and it should be good to go, but, there is some question if the machine will have enough "stroke" to accomdate the length of a splice. And, of course I'll have to come up with an anchor for the other end.