SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 07-07-2012, 08:58 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Wow

Hi,
That is indeed scary. If the halyard is indeed Vizzion, it is a composite core, with non-structural polyolefin as filler for Vectran, which takes all the load. This halyard makes sense when you (a) want to save money, (b) still want HM performance, and (c) want a fatter, easier-to-handle line. But if you, say, replaced an all-HM core with this blend, and didn't change the diameter (because of "a", above), you'd have a halyard that was at best only half as strong as it used to be. And if, as so often happens on go-fasts, the original, all-HM core rope wasn't exactly oversized, you'll be putting a horrendous load on a relatively weak rope.
This is all speculation, of course, but you could confirm at least some of this by, wait for it, running the numbers on halyard load, and comparing the result with the strength of the rope you have.
It is not likely that the clutch is to blame, else you would have seen more chafe on the cover. But one other variable is how much tension is placed on the halyard by the crew; overtensioning would make things even worse.
So I don't think that a replacement schedule, by itself, would necessarily help, if the problem is that the rope is not up to the loads. Please get back to us about this.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.