SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old 12-19-2012, 12:17 AM
Kinsa Kinsa is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: North Germany
Posts: 9
Default Elegant test ;-)

Hi Brion,
Thanks for the speedy reply, and of course the thumbs up! I intend to use the existing shafted bolts (A4) to fix the chainplates. Although I could obtain the appropriate rod and thread it, I decided to stay with the stainless because: 1) the underdeck location is dry 2) there will be a HDPE washer between stainless washer and chainplate 3) will use Tefgel or Lanolin to isolate shaft and chainplate hole and finally 4) I can monitor (see) and withdraw all the bolts easily.
The test was recommended to me by someone in the heavy lifting industry, and the key is the metal between point of suspension and the hammer stroke. If SCC is present, then the metal between the clevis pin hole and the point where the chainplate is struck doesnīt conduct the vibrations properly - I guess a bit like a guitar string when not cleanly fretted.
I have your excellent book "The complete riggers apprentice". An old seadog pointed out a small "improvement" which was new to me. "A knot and a tail" - means that all ropes with a stopper knot should have a tail long enough to grab hold of and pull when the worst happens and the stopper knot does its job. Quite logical when you think about it.
Yours aye,
Bill Attwood
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.