SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-25-2008, 04:30 PM
Bw1 Bw1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks. That clears it up.

What's the reasoning behind making the pins 30+% stronger than the wire?

-Bryan
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2008, 01:20 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bw1 View Post
Thanks. That clears it up.

What's the reasoning behind making the pins 30+% stronger than the wire?

-Bryan
Hi again,
A couple of things. One is that we expect pins (and chainplates and tangs) to last longer than wire, so we make them stronger than the wire. And because these structures are more vulnerable to fatigue, and often harder to inspect, we make them stronger still. Which brings up one of the great mysteries of my life: Skene's chainplate specs are supposed to result in 4/3 the wire strength, but if you run the numbers they are quite a bit higher than that. Does antyone know why?
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-19-2010, 01:09 PM
P38 P38 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5
Default

Hi Bryon,

Just a guess, but holes in a part increase the stress in the area around the holes by 300% to 400%. Perhaps Skeene was allowing extra to give some fatigue protection?

Regards, Paul
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.