![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Just an idea, but could you add a shim under one side to bring it around? Maybe a couple of washers. I do not know what the compression load is and if this idea would cause that section of the mast to bend in. Along the same lines, have a plate made that could carry a bigger load.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() My spreaders don't match (55 year old boat) and the guy down the gangway with a somewhat newer fiberglass boat don't match by even more. We both sail. Probably good to have them match but also good to go sailing. Oh, and in the process of trying to figure out what was going on with my rigging I discovered that the mast was off to starboard by an inch. Cut that way in the cabin top and that way for 55 years. Fleet champion and way faster than most of the L-36s around. Go figure. My point: it is a boat , not an astronomical telescope.
Allen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Here's a reply on the force from another newsgroup: (it suggests that the spreader tip out of line with the mast head and chainplate can be worth dealing with. )
How to calculate the torque? Well, if you know what the tension in the shroud is going to be (and given that the spreader is hinged, I guess we can assume the tension in the upper and lower parts will be the same), call it T, the shroud will exert a force F at the spreader tip equal to 2*T*cos(A/2), where A is the angle between the two parts of the shroud (probably around 140 degrees). The direction of the force will be in the plane defined by the two shroud parts, and will be in a direction bisecting the angle between them. Now identify the plane defined by this force direction and the axis of the spreader, and note the angle B between them (this will be about 3 degrees). The force will be resisted by the spreader in two components, one compressive along the spreader, equal to F*cos(B), and one seeking to wrench the spreader sideways, equal to F*sin(B), at right angles to the spreader and in the plane just identified (which will be horizontal (and the wrenching force will therefore be directed forward) unless the spreader is at the incorrect vertical angle (in which case the wrenching force will also have a vertical component (probably down))). The torque will then be 41 inches times that but the action of the torque on the socket, if its mountings are perhaps 4 inches apart, will be to amplify the wrenching force at the spreader tip by a factor of 10. Your rivets (if that's what holds the socket to the mast) will be pulled out with a force equal to about 1/3 the shroud tension (1/3 being roughly 10*sin(3)*2*cos(70)), so I reckon it's definitely worth correcting the problem before you pile on the pressure. But you could be lucky. Having pulled out the aft rivets, the forward ones could still hold, as the system would by then have re-balanced itself. There's a good chance the mast will stay up. :-) |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|