SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2009, 11:42 AM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Loads and hardware

Hello,
First, the load is not entirely in shear. Far from it, it might be primarily in tension, depending on the angle of the runner and padeye. And even if you land the padeye well forward, there will be significant tension on the forward bolts, as well as needless torque on the mast.
I'd either use conventional tangs, independent of the ones for the intermediates, or "lollipop" fittings, which are better than T-balls. Either option would be better for shear and tension loads than padeyes, as well as lighter.
As for the "large hole in the mast," the backing plate for the tang more than compensates for any lost metal. In addition, the tang would be in a region of the mast that is not sensitive to removal of metal, as your rigger should know.
If you go with a T or lollipop, get a fitting that ends in an eye, and splice high-modulus line to it, rather than the usual swaged-on wire.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.