SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2010, 11:56 PM
Patrick_Seattle Patrick_Seattle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 50
Default Pin direction thru mast tangs

When I took my rig down the pins on some tangs, the onese where you need to remove the tangs to remove the pins were placed from the inside out (i.e., the cotter was on the outside away from the mast).

Is there any standard for the direction you insert the pint through the mast tangs?

If I put the cotters on the outside the pin can't be removed without removing the tang.
If I put the cotters on the inside I might scratch my newly painted spars (I know a little vain).

I'm more concerned about the pin being captured behind the tang though. Part of me views that as a backup to the cotter and part of me views that as a pain since that what it was to remove the tangs to remove the pins in the first place.

Thanks,
-p
__________________
s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com | @DeeepPlaya
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-17-2010, 09:25 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Space

Hi,
In almost every instance, the cottered end should be inboard, so that the pins are removable at need, and so that the cotters are unlikely to snag on things and people. If the clevis pins are needlessly long, it can be tempting to invert the pins, to save the paint, but that is about the wrong pin length. If correct-length pins still scratch the paint, then the tangs are too short. This is important, as, in addition to scratched paint, you will have an even harder time than usual in getting at the cotters.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-18-2010, 11:39 PM
Patrick_Seattle Patrick_Seattle is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 50
Default

Thanks Brion. that makes a lot of sense!

-p
__________________
s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com | @DeeepPlaya
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2010, 03:18 PM
Brian Duff Brian Duff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 443
Send a message via AIM to Brian Duff
Default

The rule I was taught by Brad Storm, a rigger I learned a whole lot from - applies to nuts, cotter pins, etc is thus:

Inboard, aft or down.

In other words, first choice is inboard, second is aft (chain plates on deck for instance) or down ( spreader pins for example) and the reason for this is that a casual inspection form the cockpit might or a tour of the deck can see all is in place....
__________________
Brian Duff
BVI Yacht Sales, Tortola
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-08-2013, 12:14 PM
Stevienjackson Stevienjackson is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2
Default Retaining pin on mast tang

Is it acceptable to use rigging wire in place of cooter pins? I'm replacing the port spreader and upper shroud on my Ranger 33. I discovered, to my horror, on the port tang someone used rigging wire instead of a cotter pin to retain the inward facing clovis pin. Clearances are very narrow, and the tangs are probably too short as you mention above. On the opposite side there is a plastic washer under the tang which seems to increase the clearance between mast and tang. Should I add a similar washer to bring the port tang further out? Installing longer tangs might result in making the current shrouds to long to use.

Also, any suggestions on where to find rig tension guidelines for a Ranger 33?



Thanks,
Steve
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.