SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2010, 08:50 AM
seawolf seawolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 111
Default What type Brummel?

Hello all,
I started practicing the locked Brummel splice to possibly use on my lifelines.
I would like to feed the finished line through the holes in the stanchion caps and find with the locked Brummel, the total diameter of the soft splice is to big.

The original idea was to be able to feed the already spliced soft eyes through the stanchions for a completed ring hitch on the lifeline hardware.

I find I need a 9/16" hole in the stanchion to be able to slide a 1/4" amsteel soft eye splice
through with out to much trouble. This requires me to enlarge the stanchion holes that are approx. 7/16". (they are chromed bronze caps to the stanchions so should not be difficult to enlarge)
With the Locked Brummel I would require even a larger diameter hole.
Question:
Is there a more compact Brummel than that of the locked Brummel?,
or since the application of the line is not a loaded line has a halyard or running back, will a 72d bury with some good stitching along the bury suffice for this application.
It seems what the rope manufacturer suggests for their eye splice.

The boat has single line stanchions only, and is used for local coastal cruising.
Any ideas are very much appreciated.
Bob
Bob
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2010, 09:18 AM
Bob Pingel Bob Pingel is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Default Lifelines

You might not like this answer, but I would splice in place - at least one end. Not as comfy as your easy chair, but things should fit better.

The lock is there to hold the splice together during low loads. When the true load comes on, the tapered bury takes over. I think you'd have a potential for the stitching to pull out.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2010, 09:56 AM
seawolf seawolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 111
Default life lines

Bob,
Thanks for the reply.
If my Brummels are tight and spaced well, I guess the net diameter of the line shouldn't be much larger than the soft eye closed.

I seemed to have a more compact eye splice using one locked Brummel and then a tapered bury as stated in Brion's Field book #5 illustration #14 under McDonald Brummel. Bonus splice. (I do not know if this is the name of the splice, or just an added one in his text).
I like the clean look of the one locked Brummel and the bury if it is strong enough.
What do you think?
If I have to splice at the boat, not a big deal.

One more thing:
I see there is no bury in a multiple Brummel knot.
Is there a compromise on how much to bury if you wanted to go with more than one Brummel, then bury some tail.
Thanks again for your help.
Bob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-07-2010, 10:02 AM
Bob Pingel Bob Pingel is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Default Brummels

I have always used just one locked brummel and a bury. But I form the brummel using the McDonald method.

I have not measured, but the brummel should be no larger than the entry of the bury, both are formed from two whole diameters.

Multiple brummels, McDonald or not, I think are typically used with a bury. The big plus here is that you can form an eye with few to no tools.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-07-2010, 11:39 AM
seawolf seawolf is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 111
Default Brummels

Bob,
Thanks for all the information. You have been very helpful.
Single McDonald Brummel and bury sounds like a winner.
All the best.
Bob
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.