SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old 02-09-2015, 11:15 AM
county county is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 5
Default

Hi Brion,
Thanks for the reply!

Sorry, the shroud load 12,000# was mislabeled as RM.

I am using the graph in The Riggers Apprentice from Skene's Elements of Yacht Design (Foot-Pounds/D.W.L in FT.)

33' L.W.L RM=45,000
beam=11.17’

(RM*1.5)/(1/2*beam)
=(45,000*1.5)/(1/2*11.17’)
=67,500/5.58
=12,097#

Am I doing this calculation correctly?

How do I calculate what % of the load is divided among the shrouds?

How do I find a reliable source to determine load-bearing of 1/19 (the websites I looked at have varying loads)?

What I refer to as "intermediate backs" are shrouds led from the mast hound where the inner forestay connects to the same chainplate as the aft lower shrouds, connecting aft of the lower shrouds. I will refer to them as aft intermediate shrouds. My boat was designed with aft intermediate shrouds. I would like to avoid the added complexity of running backstays. Why do you think runners make more sense for my boat? I believe many cutter-rigged boats have gone below the Great Capes without them.

Thanks for your input. It is really appreciated,
Karl
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.