SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-21-2005, 02:01 PM
Ryan Ryan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Default swageless vs swaged terminals

I have read bits and pieces about swaged versus swageless terminals for standing rigging, but I was hoping that someone here could give me and unbiased pros and cons of the two, if there are any name brands to watch out for. I like the convenience that the swageless terminals seem to provide, but I don't want to use a substandard part. Thanks in advance!

Ryan Haley
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-23-2005, 10:26 AM
TomP TomP is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 39
Default mechanical v swaged

Ryan,

I think you will find that most of the mechanical terminals (Norseman, StaLok, and Hayn) all function very well. Though the Hayn models are more astheticaly pleasing. They all work well.

Some pros for using mechanicals are the terminal is re-usable (in but the extreme cases), ease of replacement, and field replaceable.
Cons would be initial cost (about 1 to 2 times a swaged fitting)

Pros for swaged fitting would be cost.
Cons would be if the wire is condemmed so is the terminal.

Tom
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-23-2005, 12:42 PM
Ryan Ryan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 28
Default

Thanks Tom. The higher cost is fine because it is balanced out by the convenience, at least for me. I just wanted to make sure that I was not giving up and strength to pay for that ease of use. Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-24-2005, 04:58 AM
Brian Duff Brian Duff is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Annapolis
Posts: 443
Send a message via AIM to Brian Duff
Default

just follow the instrucions on those mechanical fittings exactly and you should get fine strength. Oh, the hayn fitting doesn't let you use an adjustable wrench becasue they didn't make the slot on the outer piece wide enough. That and assembling the hayn on right hand lay wire are my two complaints. the sta loc and norseman are great though.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-28-2006, 03:00 PM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Default Quick Attach Terminals

Is the jury out on the "Quick Attach" Terminals? It says it's similar to Norseman and Sta-Lok, and it looks a lot easier and keeps 98% of wire strength. It's the first time I came across "Quick Attach" on the internet after seeing only comments regarding Norseman and Sta-lok as a suitable replacement to swages.

Does anybody have any experience with "Quick Attach?"

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-08-2006, 07:44 AM
MikeR MikeR is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 14
Default Compression fittings

I've used StaLok, Norseman, and Hayn. My personal favorite is StaLok, I like the separate former. Seems to make the turning of the strands more uniform. I've also had galling problems with Norseman.

The Hayn compression fittings are very nice and the crown inside does make is somewhat easier to align the strands, but I guess that, over time, I'm biased towords the StaLoks.

Cheers,

MikeR
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.